MMapFile: File locking failed with error code 37
Jerry Feldman
gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org
Thu Feb 5 07:44:09 EST 2009
Got a response from Red Hat to restart the lock daemons on both client=20
and server. This worked even though I had done this before. So, I would=20
assume case is closed.
On 02/04/2009 07:33 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> Thanks. We submitted an official bug report to Red Hat. Under the=20
> rules I must work under, all my systems must be running RHEL 5.2=20
> unpatched. While we have a mix of systems in Toronto with both=20
> Solaris and older RHEL servers, we use the NFS server for both=20
> development and server. I'll try to grab a more recent kernel when I=20
> get a chance to reboot. I can actually run a test on another system=20
> first just to verify that the new kernel fixes the problem.
>
> On 02/03/2009 08:52 PM, Nuno Sucena Almeida wrote:
>> Hi Jerry,
>>
>> as I mentioned, our problem was with locking and after some searching=
>> on the lkml , reading about similar reports and actually seeing a
>> diff on the kernel git repository, I upgraded the kernel on the
>> server and stopped having problems with NFS. It might be the same
>> issue that you have and at that time I was surprised that it took
>> that long for the problem and a fix to show up. I actually don't
>> remember the circustances where the client machines would start to
>> complain, but it wasn't obvious, although probably I used strace to
>> reach the conclusion that some weird thing was going on with locking.=
>> Good luck!,
>> Nuno
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:08:18PM -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>> =20
>>> I have a bit more information. I was able to find the lines of code, =
>>> and it has nothing to do with mmap(2). The problem is with fcntl,=20
>>> and only when int fcnt =3D fcntl(fd, F_SETLK, &fl); /* fails when NF=
S=20
>>> server is RHEL 5.2 =20
--=20
Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id: 537C5846
PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
More information about the Discuss
mailing list