[Discuss] perl/Tk
Bill Ricker
bill.n1vux at gmail.com
Fri Feb 27 18:11:11 EST 2015
Ignoring Ned's inflammatory rant, he has a kernel of sense -
> if you can abandon cpan, and use packages that are built in to your yum repository.
As a Perl pro, i agree with this much with Ned's rant -- this is very
good advice for C-based binary extensions (including library wrappers
such as Tk), when the Perl it's to be used with is from OS Yum/Deb/...
repo originally. You really really want all the C files built with
the same toolchain and flags, and a single build system is easiest way
there.
[ If you build your own Perl from sources (not very hard really),
building from CPAN works fine with it. If one is going to have lots of
custom built modules, having a local perl is recommended, if only to
avoid a sys upgrade updating /bin/perl and obsoleting all your local
built modules ! For pure-Perl modules - without C/lib* dependencies
- building from CPAN works fine. ]
--
Bill Ricker
bill.n1vux at gmail.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
More information about the Discuss
mailing list