[Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
Daniel Feenberg
feenberg at nber.org
Mon Mar 31 12:06:59 EDT 2014
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Rich Braun wrote:
> Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> Hehhehe - No. The goal is mash the power button, with the results described
>> above, while using only 2 servers and free software. ;-)
>
> Well, if the free or low-cost software existed to make it work well, I'd
> eagerly pony up to pay the electric bill running a third server. My point
> is--there have been essentially no advances in the software to operate this,
> commercial /or/ free, during the 2000s by anyone other than the paid staff at
> companies like AWS, Google, and Microsoft. Even VMware's solution is about a
> decade old by now, and its customers (like my employer) are fleeing en masse
> from private VMware clusters to AWS despite the steep price.
>
> -rich
>
Isn't the lesson here that if you can't change the client, this is really
hard, but if you can get cooperation from the client, then it is
reasonably easy? For example, an HA webserver with all the bells and
whistles might be quite hard to build, but a client that stored state in
cookies and knew to try www2.example.com when www1.example.com failed
would be pretty straightforward. I don't know why client-side HA features
have never shown up in standards since DNS was defined, but they haven't.
Daniel Feenberg
More information about the Discuss
mailing list