[Discuss] Https - the solution to net neutrality
Edward Ned Harvey (blu)
blu at nedharvey.com
Thu Jul 24 09:12:41 EDT 2014
> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org [mailto:discuss-
> bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Anderson
>
> If they broke the contract, take then to small claims court.
That was 2-3 years ago, they technically didn't break the contract because they WROTE the contract with all the legalese to protect themselves (AKA they explicitly state that channel availability may change), which I had no choice about, because my options were: Take it, or Leave it. "This is the same contract everyone else signs. It's non-negotiable." I could choose between VZ or Comcast, which is more choice than some people get.
Plus it would have cost me more than $425 to go to small claims court, in terms of wasted time. I might lose. And even if I win, where does that leave me? VZ surely won't sell service to the guy who just finished suing them.
Sorry I disagree. The small claims court idea is a bad idea.
*Additionally* once about 11 years ago I took a crooked used car dealer to small claims court, and I won. (He had overcharged my account and refused to refund.) And then after I won, he refused to refund anyway. And I had no further legal recourse, because the dollar amount was too small to put a lien on his property. So I guess effectively he won. That system simply doesn't work unless both parties agree to it.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list