[Discuss] 1 offline uncorrectable sectors detected
Jerry Feldman
gaf at blu.org
Thu Aug 22 07:35:20 EDT 2013
I'm double checking this. I actually ran badblocks the other day but did
not save the output. According to some documentation, and others on the
web that this repeated warning is always the same sector, and according
to the articles I saw is that it had been remapped. However, I just ran
a smartctl assessment, and 198 is showing 0. In the past it showed 1.
[gaf at gaf ~]$ sudo smartctl -A /dev/sdc
smartctl 6.1 2013-03-16 r3800 [x86_64-linux-3.10.7-200.fc19.x86_64]
(local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 200 200 051 Pre-fail
Always - 6
3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0027 178 133 021 Pre-fail
Always - 8066
4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 090 090 000 Old_age
Always - 10680
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail
Always - 0
7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x002e 100 253 000 Old_age
Always - 0
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 063 063 000 Old_age
Always - 27506
10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
Always - 0
11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
Always - 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
Always - 120
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
Always - 17
193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 197 197 000 Old_age
Always - 10663
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 119 081 000 Old_age
Always - 33
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
Always - 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
Always - 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 200 200 000 Old_age
Offline - 0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age
Always - 0
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 200 200 000 Old_age
Offline - 0
On 08/20/2013 03:00 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
> Jerry Feldman wrote:
>>>> Offline uncorrectable sectors detected:
>>>> /dev/sdc [SAT] - 48 Time(s)
>>>> 1 offline uncorrectable sectors detected
>> Certainly. but a minor error like this is not a serious flaw since the
>> sector has already been remapped.
> I believe the error means some operation (self-test or normal usage)
> attempted to read from a sector, it failed, and error correction and the
> usual number of retries was unable to recover.
>
> I don't think the sector has yet been remapped, and that's the whole
> point of this repeated warning. It's telling you that something is still
> pending. Had the sector been remapped, it would increment the
> reallocated sector count and you'd see a warning only once.
>
> The next time this sector gets written to, it'll get remapped, but you
> can force the issue by using "e2fsck -c", which in turn runs
> 'badblocks', or run 'badblocks' directly in a non-destructive mode if
> you aren't running an ext2/ext3/ext4 family of file system. (See the
> list archives for my posting on using 'badblocks' to burn-in a new drive.)
>
> -Tom
>
--
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id:3BC1EB90
PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
More information about the Discuss
mailing list