[Discuss] My God! It's Full of Batteries!
Stephen Adler
adler at stephenadler.com
Fri Mar 16 10:55:37 EDT 2012
Is the lack of air flow a good or bad thing? Are the new iPad going to
make good hand warmers?
Cheers. Steve.
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 10:17 -0400, Richard Pieri wrote:
> iFixit got their hands on one of the first The New iPads (by Ghu that's
> an unwieldly name) yesterday and proceeded to take it apart. This is
> relevant to the recent discussion about tablets and power consumption.
> For comparison, I have here an HP Pavilion dm1-4010us notebook with
> 11.6" 1336x768 screen and Fusion E-450 APU clocked at 1.65GHz. The
> battery pack on it is rated at 55 Watt-hours and HP rates the whole kit
> as running "up to 9.5 hours" on battery power.
>
> iPad 2 has 25 Watt-hours of battery packs inside the case and is rated
> at 9-10 hours run time. The The New iPad (by Ghu that's *still* an
> unwieldly name) has 42.5 Watt-hours of battery packs inside delivering
> the same 9-10 hours run time. Nobody's publicly posted the TDP numbers
> yet but you can figure it's rather higher than iPad 2's based on the
> power consumption.
>
> It was suggested that these devices could ramp up their bus and CPU
> clocks when on mains power. It's not "just" ramping up the clocks. You
> need to cool it. Even fanless Atom netbooks have open space for
> convection cooling. There is no space inside iPads for airflow. The
> metal case back is how iPads dissipate heat. Apple doesn't even use
> screws because they take up too much space. It's all glued together.
>
> That's the design philosophy for these things. Doesn't matter who makes
> them, be it Apple or Motorola or Barnes & Noble or whoever. More
> battery equals more run time equals better product. They're not going
> to "waste" space for airflow when that space could be used for more battery.
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list