[Discuss] Google's Nexus 7
Richard Pieri
richard.pieri at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 20:55:50 EDT 2012
On 7/12/2012 7:39 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Now look at the group of people who would like a tablet, but
> can't justify $400 or $500 at all. Quite a few can justify $200,
> especially at the holiday season with a bunch of geeky friends
> who have been raving about the good cheap tablets all fall.
I had something about Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet here, but you made a
very important point that I think is better to address: "but can't
justify $400 or $500 at all".
Go back to how I describe iPad. It's a media shopping appliance. The
big revenue isn't the devices. It's the 30% that Apple takes on every
app, every movie and TV show, every book and every song sold. Apple and
iOS are very, very good at separating consumers from their disposable
income. It prints money.
A consumer who can't afford a premium tablet doesn't have much
disposable income. The media shopping appliance isn't something that he
can afford so the mindset behind the purchase is very different. He
doesn't see the "necessity" of such a thing.
All of which is a very convoluted way of saying that iPad is a toy for
the wealthy and the well-off. This is why trying to sell iPad-like
devices to the rest of us doesn't work. We're simply not interested in
dropping $200-$300 on a device that exists to make it easy and
convenient for the vendor to soak up what little we have left.
The game changes once you get the price down to around $150. That's one
of the sweet spots for consumer electronics. Get the price down to that
point and you have a shot at sustained middle class buy-in. But you
still need a product that they want to buy.
--
Rich P.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list