Drumming Up More Internet Addresses
Ethan Schwartz
ethan.boston-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Mon Feb 14 15:08:54 EST 2011
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> wrote:
Who could have guessed that 4.3 billion Internet connections wouldn’t be
> enough?
>
> Certainly not Vint Cerf.
>
> The next few years could get interesting.
>
4.3 billion addresses... how many are being squatted on due to assignment of
huge swaths to major organizations...
I used CTRL-F to search for "routing" and "complex" ... nothing in there
about just how difficult routing IPv6 addresses will be... what a nightmare
that will be...
The average user has no idea how IP works... considering that the vast
majority of home and commercial devices are behind some form of NAT I
suspect that the initial transition is going to consist of enabling of NAT
features on CTE devices like cable/DSL modems, routers, etc... the firewall
device will understand IPv6, and provide the inside devices with private
IPv4 addresses that they already understand.
I'm imaging a transition like that of analog to digital TV... people who are
behind the times, so to speak, will receive a "converter box" which will
provide NAT... the rest will be forced to potentially endure a reboot or two
on a few devices :)
More information about the Discuss
mailing list