[Discuss] Backing up LVM partitions using snapshots
Richard Pieri
richard.pieri at gmail.com
Thu Dec 15 11:38:58 EST 2011
On 12/15/2011 8:25 AM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote:
> The problem I have with tape is how poor its reliability is. When I worked
> at Sytron, a tape backup software company, the reality was (and still is)
> that tape is not 100% reliable, hell, not even 99% reliable. Tape backups
Neither are disks, nor disk and RAID controllers, nor the people who use
them. Allow me to remind you of the RAID controller that I had go
stupid earlier this year. It quietly scribbled all over the file
system, wrecking some 7TB of data. This is why we make backups. They
are the tools we use to recover from failures and mistakes and disasters.
> are designed as a solution that accepts that if you have enough coverage,
> you'll probably be safe. Tape always has a risk that data will be lost and
> if you have enough tapes, your data is surely safe on one of them.
How is this at all different from replication? Answer: it isn't. The
only practical difference is the medium.
> That model is changing. The EMCs, NetAPPs and the like don't rely on tape.
> They rely on the sort of strategy I am describing. Duplicate reduction and
> replication, not "backup."
This is just another tape is dead marketing spiel used to sucker IT
purchasers. The promise of "lower costs" convinces them that storage
frames and cloud storage is the way to go. It's a trap. A storage
frame has finite capacity. If you want to expand beyond that limit then
you have to buy another frame or an expansion chassis. Tape libraries
are infinitely expandable: you buy more tapes. Those tapes are going to
cost an order of magnitude less than the cost a new frame. Really.
300TB of LTO-5 costs $10,000-$15,000; a 300TB raw capacity EMC Symmetrix
starts around $200,000.
I'm not going to say you shouldn't buy disk-based backup systems. I use
them myself for some purposes. They're a useful stage for enterprise
backups. They are not the be-all to data integrity. Layers of
protection is how you maintain the integrity of your data. Reliance on
any single technology or device is a mistake.
I'm not just saying that. I'm saying that from my experiences at a big
EMC shop (Thomson-Reuters) and a big TSM shop (MIT).
--
--Rich P.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list