another Comcast head-end goes digital
Mark J Dulcey
mark-OGhnF3Lt4opAfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org
Sun Jan 31 21:15:24 EST 2010
On 1/31/2010 8:57 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
>> ...I just want the basic channels, 1-26, unencrypted.
>
> So are you saying the entire town of Natick doesn't have unencrypted
> QAM, even for the FCC mandated over-the-air broadcast channels?
They're not required to provide it unencrypted. They can EITHER do so,
or provide free cable boxes to all basic cable subscribers who ask for
them. They still get to charge you for cable boxes that can access
premium channels, on-demand services, and so forth, and being cable
companies they won't make any great effort to make you aware of the
lowest cost option. And yes it sucks for anybody who wants to use a DVR
that isn't provided by the cable company, but they consider that a
feature rather than a bug.
In the analog cable days the cable guys could block a house from
receiving specific channels by using traps. That doesn't work with
digital cable because many channels are mashed up together in one
high-speed stream of bits. So the companies may prefer to encrypt
everything (or everything other than local broadcast channels) so they
have more control over who can receive what channels.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list