Frackin script kiddies!!

[Richard Pieri]

On Aug 5, 2010, at 8:25 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
> 
> That still sounds like it is running on one of the end points
> (client).  In order to do that the end point has to have already been
> compromised.   That's very different from manipulating the
> communications path between two secure end points.

If you see the computer that the game client runs on as an end-point then yes, you are correct.   If, however, you look at the game client as an end-point then it is an MitM attack.

--Rich P.