Insight on partitioning a LAMP Server design issue
Dan Ritter
dsr-mzpnVDyJpH4k7aNtvndDlA at public.gmane.org
Sat Oct 31 12:26:05 EDT 2009
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:20:26PM -0400, Tom Metro wrote:
> Stephen Goldman wrote:
> > The device is a brand new Dell server with:
> > /dev/sda raid one 160 G
> > /dev/sdb raid five 270G
> ...
> > There is a total of six drives :
> > Raid one for the OS
> > Raid five for the data & db
>
> So really you're talking about /dev/md0 .. /dev/md4 for the first set
> (given your proposed list of partitions), and /dev/md5 for the second.
I don't think so. I think that the hardware RAID is taking
physical disks 0 and 1 and presenting them as sda, and physical
disks 2,3,4,5 and presenting them as sdb.
LVM may be a win for him, long term. I generally agree with the
rest of what you write.
-dsr-
--
http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference.
You can't defend freedom by getting rid of it.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list