Software as a profession sucks, a rant.
David Rosenstrauch
darose-prQxUZoa2zOsTnJN9+BGXg at public.gmane.org
Fri Oct 23 10:42:21 EDT 2009
On 10/23/2009 08:53 AM, Matthew Gillen wrote:
> On 10/22/2009 11:33 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>> On 10/22/2009 11:08 AM, Mark Woodward wrote:
>>> What does BLU think?
>> I think a lot depends on what company you work for.
>
> Ditto that.
>
>> ...
>> IME the negatives you point out appear far more often in larger and/or
>> more mature companies.
>
> I would venture to say it happens a lot in companies where software is
> not the core product.
> But
> there will always be companies that are "high-technology", who have the
> values you seem to be nostalgic for. Likewise, there will always be
> customers for those companies, businesses for which technology (and
> software in particular) /will/ be a competitive advantage. It's just
> that the pool of companies in that category is smaller than it used to
> be (it used to be everyone, but now a lot of core business software has
> become a commodity).
>
> Matt
I would say that's exactly right. If the OP wants to keep doing
exciting interesting tech work, he needs to seek out companies where
technology *is* their business.
In my work experience examples, the bank I worked for was not, while for
both the enterprise software company and the internet startup it was/is
- and my job satisfaction reflected that.
DR
More information about the Discuss
mailing list