Desktop relevance
John Boland
jj.boland-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Sun Mar 29 15:14:40 EDT 2009
i've been using the rpm. i've applied the kernel header patch. but, it
still fails when building the modules.
i have installed 1.x on several i386 machines without a problem, at least
after the kernel patch. so, i'm guessing that i'm following the procedure
correctly.
my explanation/guess/excuse has been that there's something funky with my
hardware. also, i have problems installing real vnc on 64 bit. the
installs for i386 are a breeze.
here's the output from cat /proc/cpuinfo:
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 35
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2210.013
cache size : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 0
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm
3dnowext 3dnow rep_good nopl pni lahf_lm cmp_legacy
bogomips : 4420.02
TLB size : 1024 4K pages
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp
processor : 1
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 15
model : 35
model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+
stepping : 2
cpu MHz : 2210.013
cache size : 1024 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
core id : 1
cpu cores : 2
apicid : 1
initial apicid : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm
3dnowext 3dnow rep_good nopl pni lahf_lm cmp_legacy
bogomips : 4419.79
TLB size : 1024 4K pages
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts fid vid ttp
tia...
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Ben Eisenbraun <bene-Gk2boCrsRs1AfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:06:44AM -0400, John Boland wrote:
> > i've been struggling with this x86_64 box for a while. do you have any
> > tips/tricks for f9 or is faster/easier to upgrade to f10?
>
> What are your issues with VMware Server 1.x on x86_64 machines? I have
> been running that version, first on Fedora 7 x86_64 and then on CentOS 5
> x86_64 for the last two years without issues.
>
> The 1.0.2 installation on Fedora 7 (2.6.23) required some patches at the
> time to run with that kernel, but I installed 1.0.8 on CentOS 5 (2.6.18)
> the other day straight from the download tarball without any issue.
>
> -ben
>
> --
> the cure for boredom is curiosity. there is no cure for curiosity.
> <dorothy parker>
>
--
If it ain't broke, you're not trying hard enough!
More information about the Discuss
mailing list