comshaft strikes again

[Don Levey]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Richard Chonak wrote:
> Hmmmm, I can't blame comshaft for this one.   This time.
> 
> Carrying a broad range of Usenet content on a server -- even text-only 
> -- subjects a cable provider to ongoing complaints that it is a direct 
> purveyor of objectionable material (pr9n, hate-speech, copyvios, etc.). 
>   Comca$t's own TOS probably forbids all that stuff.
> 

I don't know about Comcast, but RCN (for a brief period) contracted that
service out to Giganews.  Not that the companies were ever concerned all
that much with customer complaints.

 -Don
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFI4gtb2eQWgVKt880RAsm1AKCvJkXbNmvCR4zWBAGNORTBttXb2ACgtsp3
/uukdLsffdkplLIKgnT884o=
=xkth
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----