Comcast/Mythtv (OT?)
Mark J. Dulcey
mark-OGhnF3Lt4opAfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org
Mon Nov 24 13:59:52 EST 2008
Tom Metro wrote:
> ...
>> My worry is that this is a sign that they want to get rid
>> of their analog feed entirely...
>
> Undoubtedly. As another poster pointed out, the cable companies don't
> like having to retransmit the same stations in multiple formats. (SD
> analog, SD digital, HD digital.)
It's not just that they don't like transmitting in multiple formats;
they don't like transmitting in analog at all. Each analog channel takes
a lot of spectrum on the cable; the same amount of space could be used
to transmit anywhere from 4 to 10 digital channels. The pressure to
carry more channels, and especially more HD channels, will likely cause
all cable systems to drop analog in the near future; it's just not all
that expensive for them to provide cable boxes to everybody, and they'll
just include the expense in the next rate increase anyway.
If some consumer forces have their way, getting the cable companies to
transmit more channels in clear QAM is also a lost cause. There is
public pressure to get them to offer most channels "a la carte" instead
of as part of bundles; if that happens the likely method of
implementation is mandatory smart cable boxes, plus encrypted
transmission of nearly all content. About the only things you'll get in
the clear are local broadcast channels, local access (if it survives),
any extra PBS content they choose to carry, shopping channels, and C-SPAN.
A better move might be to push for a standard control interface for
interface between PVRs and cable boxes, so people won't have to fuss
with stupid IR blasters and the like. The cable companies won't like
that either, as they would rather sell you a PVR as well, but a public
campaign (possibly with congressional and/or FCC involvement) might at
least have some chance of gaining traction.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list