Restaurants for our after-meeting meetings

[John Abreau]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm partial to the idea of alternating months: perhaps the
Brewery on even months, and somewhere new on odd months.

What do you guys think?


Jerry Feldman wrote:
> Last night we met at Atasca (http://www.atasca.com/hamp/index.html).
> The place was nice, the food was very good, but the prices were quite
> high. However it is much quieter than the Brewery. Both Rob and I had
> grilled cod, and it was excellent. I put in $30 and that is with just
> the meal and coffee. 
> 
> Also we talked about the MIT Muddy Charles Pub. They have free chicken
> wings on Wednesday nights, but according to John Malloy, it is quite a
> zoo with all the graduate students trying to get at the wings. 
> 
> We are kind of limited to an area around Kendall Sq, but a lot of
> places close around 10. Both Atasca and the Brewery are within a 10
> minute walk.  I would suspect that the hotel restaurants are probably
> not set up for parties of 8 to 12 that show up unannounced at 9:30. 
> 
> I just spoke to the Cambridge Brewing Company (http://www.cambrew.com/),
> and they definitely close their kitchen at 10:00PM, NOT 9:30.  
> 
> So, lets open the discussion again. Personally, I don't mind
> experimenting on new places. 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


- --
John Abreau
IT Manager
Zuken USA
238 Littleton Rd., Suite 100
Westford, MA 01886
T: 978-392-1777            F: 978-692-4725
M: 978-764-8934
E: John.Abreau-3flU0AWMlV4AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org  W: www.zuken.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGTJaliof7R0HCNyURAo/QAJoDS/3SoK8dxz+SwpieFBsV3TS1DgCeIMqQ
HFom4BC2OAkQR90Z6L5WSSk=
=KSJs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.