Help me pick a CPU/Mobo
Robert L Krawitz
rlk at alum.mit.edu
Sun Mar 25 14:18:23 EDT 2007
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:02:52 -0400
From: David Kramer <david at thekramers.net>
Kordova wrote:
> I find the opposite to be true. I do not watch movies on my laptop, but
> having my editor open alongside a web/documentation browser and/or
> terminal windows can be a life saver. I view it as being analogous to a
> real life desk. You keep the document you are working on to one side,
> and a reference or two to the side of it.
How do others feel about doing development on a widescreen? To me,
seeing more lines of code is better than more columns of code.
I don't care for wide screens one bit. I also find more lines is
better that more columns, but pixel count is really where it's at.
Furthermore, for editing images, widescreen is all but useless -- even
a landscape (horizontal) image (3:2) isn't wide enough, when you take
into account menu bars, window decorations, and such, and a portrait
(vertical) image is all but impossible to edit that way.
This is becoming a big deal, because it looks like a lot of the
high end laptops are widescreen. In particular, all of the HP
laptops are WXGA.
These 17" WXGA screens seem like a complete waste to me. Even 10
years ago -- when all monitors were CRT-based, and weren't
particularly sharp -- it was recommended that you run XGA resolution
on a 17" monitor (which was really 16"), but many people ran SXGA on
them. LCD's are so much sharper -- 1600x1200 on a 15" display is very
usable -- that it's a real waste to run such low resolution on a huge
display, unless all you're interested in is watching movies.
--
Robert Krawitz <rlk at alum.mit.edu>
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf at uunet.uu.net
Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
--Eric Crampton
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list