Help Interpreting traceroute output
miah
jjohnson at sunrise-linux.com
Mon Oct 18 12:46:00 EDT 2004
The manpage clearly states that its the round trip time of the
packet..
"Three probes (change with -q flag) are sent at each ttl setting and a
line is printed showing the ttl, address of the gateway and round trip
time of each probe."
-miah
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 12:35:12PM -0400, trlists at clayst.com wrote:
> I am troubleshooting a performance problem for a client that involves
> installing a software package from a mirror site. The folks who built
> the package, and the installer, think it's our server or network that
> is slowing things down, but we've convinced outselves it's not, and
> we're looking at wider network throughput issues to see what that
> shows.
>
> In doing so I've been using traceroute on several different Linux boxes
> and the results don't make sense to me.
>
> Before I get into the details, let me check something basic. In the
> traceroute output, is the time shown the total time to the listed
> gateway, or the time from the previous gateway to the listed gateway.
> For example (just showing one of the three trials here), in this
> output:
>
> 5 oc12.Level3.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net (209.244.160.150) 204.218 ms
> 6 p16-1-1-0.r20.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.36) 188.715 ms
>
> do I read it as calculated values of 204 ms from gateway 4 to 5 and an
> additional 189 from gateway 5 to 6, so that the times add? Or as raw
> values showing that a test packet made it to gateway 5 with a TTL of
> 204 ms and the next one made it to gateway 6 with a TTL of 189 ms
> (presumably because things were a little faster when the second packet
> was sent)?
>
> The latter is the only way that makes sense to me, but several people
> who have been around Linux a while have claimed that the times are hop
> to hop, not cumulative?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Tom
More information about the Discuss
mailing list