Big BLU -- Options

[Jeff Kinz]

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:48:56PM -0400, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote:
> We could have a very loose cluster, where we basically keep our machines
> at home and they connect to some central server node. This is sub optimal
> because the network connection is slow. This would force what ever tasks
> we run on this to have a much higher ratio of CPU to data, but it would be
> the easiest.

A virtual cluster.  This may work better than we think.  Many BLU
folks are on Cable or DSL.  Not great for truly distributed processing
but we can utilize it with partitionable tasks.

> We could start small, only a few machines in someone's basement.
Yes, cooler & no weight concerns, AC? Dust? (Dpends on the basement)
Spend bucks (below) on paying them for power and AC?

> We could all chip in a few bucks and see what that, and the generosity of
> some colo, will get us.



> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 

-- 
Linux/Open Source.  Now all your base belongs to you, for free.
============================================================
Idealism:  "Realism applied over a longer time period"

Jeff Kinz, Emergent Research, Hudson, MA.