Emacs LISP & macros

[Derek Martin]

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 08:09:05AM -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> I think that Bill had his sequence wrong. 

This may well be true; however regardless of what the actual key
binding is, I have also had this problem with Xemacs on Red Hat
systems.  I don't remember what key sequence it was bound to by
default, and I don't have time right now to investigate, so I'll
assume you are correct.  I also haven't used (x)emacs in months,
having found that vim does everything that I wanted Xemacs to do for
me with a lot less fuss and much quicker load times.  But I do
remember that Xemacs will tell you what key sequence a function is
bound to, and that no combination of the named keys would activate
that function...  I was only ever able to activate the function using
the M-x trick.

-- 
Derek D. Martin
http://www.pizzashack.org/
GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.
Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail.
Sorry for the inconvenience.  Thank the spammers.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20031013/14c45494/attachment.sig>