Stripped PGP sigs? (was Re: cvs help)

[Jerry Feldman]

On 27 Jun 2003 11:19:15 -0400
Derek Atkins <warlord at MIT.EDU> wrote:

> A agree -- stripping out application/pgp (or application/s-mime* )
> attachments is a BAD Idea.  People who sign their mail should be
> encouraged to continue to do so, and the list software should
> not gratuitously remove security from email messages in the name
> of whatever reason you've thought this was a good idea.
The stripper has worked very well on some other lists where many people
post alternative text/html messages and attachments, and even
occasionally send viruses. This list has been clean, but we do get hit
by a few viruses and SPAMs daily. They are all blocked by mailman,
becuase, hopefully, very few people on this list use Outlook Express. 

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030627/135db942/attachment.sig>