WASTE and the GPL, plus a patch for the code
Robert L Krawitz
rlk at alum.mit.edu
Mon Jun 2 09:32:19 EDT 2003
From: "Warren E. Agin" <wea at swiggartagin.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 08:40:03 -0400
Keep in mind that a license contract is an agreement between two
parties. As the lawyer in the group, I doubt AOL can revoke an
accepted GPL license. However, if a person accepting the license
at the click-through stage has knowledge that Nullsoft lacked
actual authority to enter into a GPL license, then that person may
have a problem relying on the GPL license to justify his use of the
product. He would be liable for copyright infringement.
The GPL is not a contract. It's a conditional grant of additional
rights that would otherwise not be granted under copyright (so states
the FSF). As it notes, you're not required to accept the GPL, but in
that case you only have the normal rights that come with copyright --
in particular, no right to distribute.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list