Is RedHat 9 stable?

[Ed Hill]

On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 09:42, josephc at etards.net wrote:
> We run it on two production e-mail servers and have yet to see any 
> problems
> 
> -joe
> 
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Bill Horne wrote:
> 
> > I'm currently running RedHat 7.3, and would like to upgrade to RedHat 9.
> > 
> > If you're using v 9, please tell me if it's stable.
> > 
> > TIA.
> > 
> > Bill Horne


I've been running Red Hat 9 on my laptop, three web servers, and a
number of workstations running a mix of:

  LabVIEW, Postgres, custom C/C++ apps for control/DAQ/analysis

Some of the installs were fairly recent and others were done about a
week after the original release.  All of the systems have been very
stable.  The only problem that I've experienced that was unique to RH9
was a failure during MatLAB installation -- and that problem has been
identified and fixed by the folks at the MathWorks.

For me, RH9 has been a joy to use.

Ed


-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
http://paoc.mit.edu/paoc/people/person.asp?position=Postdoc&who=edhill
office:  Room 54-1424;  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
         Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
email:   eh3 at mit.edu,  ed at eh3.com
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030707/2bc7f0eb/attachment.sig>