Microsoft hits new ethical low point?
Derek Martin
ddm at pizzashack.org
Fri Feb 16 21:42:55 EST 2001
Today, Derek Atkins gleaned this insight:
> John Chambers <jc at trillian.mit.edu> writes:
>
> > In comparison, I have Unix software that I wrote 15 years ago that
> > still compiles and runs without problems on any Unix-like system from
> > any vendor.
> >
> > We really should be publicising things like this. If you seriously
> > want a common platform, Microsoft flunks even the most basic tests,
> > while Unix, with all its warts, does a fairly decent job of providing
> > portability across years, hardware changes, and even major rewrites
> > of the kernel.
>
> <Devil's Advocate>
> But I have to recompile my software for every release of Linux,
> Solaris, IRIX, OSF/DUnix, *BSD, etc. I don't have to recompile my
> software for Windows. Once I've built it, it works. It will work on
That isn't true. Specific example: the scanner software that came with my
UMAX Page Scanner works under Windows 95, but NOT under Windows 98 (and I
don't think it works under NT either, but I'm not sure). Are there
others? You betcha! Am I gonna catalog them for you? No way dude...
> all variants, and it will work on all systems. I can't even build a
> single Linux application that will work on all versions of a single
> release of Linux (it wont work across Linux/x86, Linux/sparc,
> Linux/ppc, Linux/alpha, etc.)
> </Devil's Advocate>
This, also, is not true. At least not necessarily, assuming you install
compatibility libraries and run the app appropriately. In fact, you can
run Linux binaries on most other x86 U*ixes, including (I believe) SCO,
Solaris x86, FreeBSD (and probably the other *BSDs too) using their
various compatibility packages. And vice-versa, I believe, using the iBCS
module (if that still works these days... never had a use for it).
Windows is WORSE in all cases...
--
Derek Martin
ddm at pizzashack.org
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
More information about the Discuss
mailing list