disk inconsistency - should 'fsck' always executed with -y ?
Jerry Feldman
gaf at blu.org
Fri Feb 2 14:55:10 EST 2001
What I meant was that if you have a drive with a lot of errors, it might be
indicative of a failing drive. If you have your system set up for automatic
recovery, you might not know about a problem until you've lost the drive.
Log files tell the story only if you look at them. Also, if fsck makes
changes to the root file system, you will need to reboot. fsck is normally
run on unmounted file systems which do not require a reboot when
modified, so you really want to make sure everything is performed in
such a manner as to recover your file system as best as possible without
making the problem worse. If you want a thorough fsck during boot, you
probably also want the script to force a reboot if fsck fixes an error since
you have one partition.
On 2 Feb 2001, at 13:38, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
> > It is simply when there is a serious problem, you might want
> > a human to take a look at it.
>
> Again, just how does one do that?
>
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Associate Director
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
More information about the Discuss
mailing list