disk inconsistency - should 'fsck' always executed with -y ?

[Glenn Burkhardt]

> If that file system is messed up, running fsck with the -y option could 
> cause a lot of data to be lost. Even when the file system is corrupted, 
> you might be able to copy off the data. 

Do you know of any good references on how to do that, to look for potentially
lost data?

> For the most part, you could use that option, but it would slow down 
> booting (as Derek pointed out), and for the most part, you can use it with 
> confidence. 

If there's only one disk, and only one partition on the disk (which is how I
typically set up our systems), there wouldn't be any slowdown.  And the
slowdown would only occur when fsck executes.  If the system has been properly
shut down, it almost never executes.

> It is simply when there is a serious problem, you might want 
> a human to take a look at it. 

Again, just how does one do that?


-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).