The real reason for "no servers"
John Chambers
jc at trillian.mit.edu
Mon Aug 13 16:23:59 EDT 2001
--------
David Kramer writes:
| On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, John Chambers wrote:
| > Maybe I'm being silly, but it occurs to me that it might be useful to
| > point out that web servers run quite well on other ports than 80.
|
| ... and if everyone I knew was as technical as the least technical person
| on this list, that would be a perfectly acceptable solution. That is far
| from the case though. Even writing out http://thekramers.net:8080, it
| would take my parents several tries to get it right.
Yeah; I know what you mean. I've lost track of how many times I've
had to explain to people on the phone how to type a tilde char. (And
the demographers tell us that between 20 and 25% of the US population
speaks a language that uses it ;-). It's a good thing that most web
servers automatically convert \ to /, or it'd be really impossible.
| The other issue, which was mentioned by someone on this list or another
| (the same thread is happening on another list I'm on), was this is very
| likely the camel's nose in the tent. If they shut down 80 for the purpose
| of catching all those hooligan hackers eating up all their precious
| bandwidth, you know they're going to shut down 20 and 21 to kill ftp, and
| then telnet (like I care), and finally, when they hire an MIT graduate in
| the right position, ssh (EEEK!).
|
| No, when they shut down port 80 on my connection, I will shut down my
| contract with them.
Heh. So you have an alternative available? Most people don't. We're a
bit pampered here in the Boston area.
Some time back, before I was kicked off mediaone, I got a letter from
them that listed their restrictions, and they were quite clear that
"no servers" meant "no servers". I asked them if they really
preferred to use their own machine's resources to store and forward
email, when it could be sent directly to my machine with no effort at
all on the part of their servers. Their answer was yes, they did want
my mail stored on their machines. They wouldn't say why.
Lest we think that being worried about this is paranoid, consider the
fact that a few months ago there was a bit of a fuss at MSN when
users discovered that their personal files (mostly images) were being
used in advertising. When asked, Microsoft's answer was that their
contract clearly states that files stored on their machines are their
property.
They did back off from the practice, for now. But they haven't
changed the wording of their contracts. If you go to msn.com and look
up the Terms of Use pages, you'll find that
You may not modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform,
reproduce, publish, license, create derivative works from,
transfer, or sell any information, software, products or services
obtained from the MSN Sites/Services.
They ARE talking about their customers' personal files stored in
their web areas. As a customer, you can't give a friend the right to
do something with any of your files; your friends must ask MSN for
permission.
It's highly likely that ATT's lawyers have also figured this out, and
part of their "no servers" idea is that they want you to put your web
site on their machines, where they can then claim ownership of any
file they like. It might be interesting to go over their contracts
and see if this might be the situation now. I did find this text at
http://www.attbroadband.com/services/other/TermsAndConditions.html:
AT&T Broadband Web Site Agreement
...
2. Copyright, Licenses and Idea Submissions. The entire contents of
the Service are copyrighted under the United States copyright laws.
The owner of the copyright is AT&T Broadband. You may print and
download portions of material from the different areas of the
Service solely for your own non-commercial use.
This document appears to cover web pages on customers' personal web
sites as well as the actual ATT files. Note that they are claiming
that they own the copyright to all material on their sites, including
"Submissions" from others.
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
More information about the Discuss
mailing list