High Availability monitors for UNIX?
David Kramer
david at thekramers.net
Mon Dec 11 23:10:05 EST 2000
As some of you know, I am looking for another job. I just interviewed at
a company today called Availant (http://www.availant.com). The main
product is a rules-based high availability system watchdog. They
currently only support NT, and want me (and about 5 others) to port it to
some flavor of *NIX to be named soon.
They admitted they went the easy, non-portable route when they did the NT
version, and they used almost every Microsoft-specific technology out
there, including COM, DCOM, XML DCOM, EIEIO... I have no reason to
believe they won't try to do another rush job, so I am inclined to tell
them I am not interested, but there is a larger issue. Aren't there
plenty of well-designed, powerful *NIX system monitoring products out
there already? Aren't there even several open source ones? So is there
really a market for a new one that's bloated with too much technology
(using CORBA instead of COM, etc)?
I would like to hear from anyone who has experience with such a product to
see if my assumption is right.
Thanks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DDDD David Kramer http://thekramers.net
DK KD
DKK D Intelligence is knowing how to build a nuclear bomb.
DK KD Wisdom is knowing how not to need them.
DDDD Shaggy 2 Dope- Insane Clown Posse
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
More information about the Discuss
mailing list